{"id":247581,"date":"2023-12-06T14:48:57","date_gmt":"2023-12-06T14:48:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/automotobuzz.com\/?p=247581"},"modified":"2023-12-06T14:48:57","modified_gmt":"2023-12-06T14:48:57","slug":"best-electric-car-charging-stations-2024-uks-top-charger-networks-rated-by-ev-owners","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/automotobuzz.com\/car-reviews\/best-electric-car-charging-stations-2024-uks-top-charger-networks-rated-by-ev-owners\/","title":{"rendered":"Best electric car charging stations 2024: UK's top charger networks rated by EV owners"},"content":{"rendered":"
The bad, the good and the outstanding; you rank the major players in the expanding UK charging network<\/h2>\n
\n<\/p>\n
Tesla has cleaned up in our Driver Power survey of electric car public chargepoint providers. Its satisfaction scores were miles ahead of its closest rivals for Driver Power glory, namely MFG EV Power and InstaVolt, which finished second and third.<\/p>\n
The US maker is riding high in the UK sales charts, and part of its popularity clearly rests on a charger network that tops 10 out of 11 of our satisfaction categories. It only drops marks for locations, where it is third behind GeniePoint and Gridserve. But neither of those two scored well enough elsewhere to trouble the top three overall.<\/p>\n
\n
Best home EV chargers 2023<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The MFG EV Power network didn\u2019t top the table in any category, but it did rack up six second places. Sixth places for pricing and its smartphone app were less impressive, though. InstaVolt\u2019s best performances were second places for its customer service, and the functionality of its app, but it ranked poorly for pricing, down in eighth place.<\/p>\n
Our survey invites verified electric car drivers to rate their chargepoint experiences across a wide range of factors. Among the categories are price, charging speeds, ease of use and reliability, but we also ask users for their opinions on aspects such as accessibility, security and lighting, presentation and the condition of sites. Last but not least, we investigate the functionality of related smartphone apps.<\/p>\n
Almost as remarkable as the consistently good scores from Tesla are the consistently poor scores of BP Pulse, with drivers ranking it bottom of our table or second-worst in every category except price, where it managed to raise its game to seventh.<\/p>\n
A day in the life of a UK electric charge station<\/h2>\n
To put the UK\u2019s charging network into perspective, last year we headed to a Shell Recharge station to gain some invaluable public insight. Our chosen destination was the Buckden Shell station in central Cambridgeshire, a long-time favourite spot for petrol and diesel cars to fill up, given that it sits on the southbound A1. Surely we could expect the four charging stations to be similarly busy during a working day?<\/p>\n
In truth, there was always at least one charging bay free on the day of our visit, suggesting that for now, this station is keeping up with demand. Reversing into bay one, ready to start his working day, was Wayne Lester, who was recharging his month-old BMW iX for a journey into London.<\/p>\n
\u201cI had a bit of an electric-charging faux pas last night,\u201d he admitted. \u201cI plugged my car in but forgot to press \u2018start\u2019, so I have to boost up here a little bit.\u201d The station is advertised as a 175kW fast charger, but Wayne\u2019s iX was charging at around 68kW, despite being the only car plugged in. Still, he was happy with the rate: \u201cI can go into London now on eight minutes of charge, which is pretty good.\u201d<\/p>\n
He does concede that EV charging requires a bit of planning, though: \u201cI think we need more of these high-speed chargers. You\u2019ve just got to resign yourself to the fact that you\u2019re not going to come in, fill up and then drive off again; it\u2019s about planning your routes a bit more.\u201d<\/p>\n
\n<\/p>\n
Wayne wants to make the most of the iX\u2019s 257-mile range with a drive from Lincolnshire to Scotland: \u201cI\u2019ll have to charge three times,\u201d he said, \u201cbut I\u2019d be stopping for breaks anyway.\u201d<\/p>\n
Most chargepoints offer a smartphone app that can help with locating the station, payment and features. Wayne said he struggles with the apps on offer: \u201cI\u2019ve got about 50: Instavolt, BP Pulse, Pod Point… It can be a nightmare.\u201d<\/p>\n
Recharging their brand-new Skoda Enyaq for the first time were Carol and Adrian Hogg, newcomers to electric-car charging. \u201cWe\u2019ve used diesel vehicles for our business up until now,\u201d said Adrian. \u201cAn issue is that the charger doesn\u2019t print a receipt, so we have to use the app.\u201d<\/p>\n
During her first experience of charging an EV, Carol pointed out a common flaw with charging stations. \u201cIn the sun it\u2019s going to be hot \u2013 and without a cover I\u2019m going to be really upset in the rain.\u201d However, she admitted that the station itself was \u201cclean, tidy and nicely laid out\u201d.<\/p>\n
Their new Enyaq will have to adapt to being the family car, so relatively short 44-mile trips to the office will be joined by the odd journey to the Lake District. Adrian voiced his concerns: \u201cOn most main routes and motorways there are plenty of chargepoints, but once you get into the countryside you need to research it a bit more to see if there\u2019s the ability to recharge.\u201d He remained optimistic, however: \u201cCharging an EV can only improve. If we can manage now, then surely it\u2019s only going to get better. We\u2019ll see \u2013 it\u2019s a learning curve.\u201d<\/p>\n
There are plenty of areas to improve on then, but which companies are getting it right? Read on to see our list of the best electric car chargepoints as voted by you.<\/p>\n
The UK\u2019s best public electric car chargepoint providers<\/h2>\n
1. Tesla – 89.72%<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n
Having opened up its public charge points to non-Tesla drivers, the Supercharger network has gone from strength-to-strength with customers praising it across the board. In fact, it finished at the summit in 10 of our 11 categories, with only location of chargers failing to take top honours.<\/p>\n
\n\n
\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n
Rank<\/td>\n
Percentage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Overall<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
89.72%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Prices<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
80.73%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Lighting and security<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
88.13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Charging speed<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
95.82%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Ease of use<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
96.37%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Number of chargers<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
89.34%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Reliability<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
96.01%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Location of chargers<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
80.48%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Presentation and condition<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
93.74%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Customer service<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
85.11%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Smartphone app<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
93.14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Accessibility and needs catering<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
88.06%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
2. MFG EV Power – 82.07%<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n
MFG EV Power scored highly across all of our categories. Although it failed to secure any top spots, consistency was key as\u00a0it took second in six sectors, including charging speed and reliability – two major concerns\u00a0for many electric car drivers. It was only really price and a less than impressive smartphone app that let it down.<\/p>\n
\n\n
\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n
Rank<\/td>\n
Percentage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Overall<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
82.07%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Prices<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
66.02%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Lighting and security<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
85.71%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Charging speed<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
87.26%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Ease of use<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
89.96%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Number of chargers<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
80.16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Reliability<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
89.58%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Location of chargers<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
79.15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Presentation and condition<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
89.58%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Customer service<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
82.65%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Smartphone app<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
72.32%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Accessibility and needs catering<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
80.42%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
3. InstaVolt Ltd – 80.61%<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n
Customers love InstaVolt's smartphone app and its high level of customers service, while charging speeds and reliability also impressed. In fact it was a strong all round performance that helped InstaVolt take third place overall, with seven top three finishes across our 11 categories. High costs were the only negative.<\/p>\n
\n\n
\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n
Rank<\/td>\n
Percentage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Overall<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
80.61%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Prices<\/td>\n
8<\/td>\n
63.76%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Lighting and security<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
81.52%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Charging speed<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
85.88%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Ease of use<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
88.84%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Number of chargers<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
70.65%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Reliability<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
86.81%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Location of chargers<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
79.59%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Presentation and condition<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
87.02%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Customer service<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
83.18%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Smartphone app<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
80.37%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Accessibility and needs catering<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
79.08%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
4. Gridserve – 77.67%<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n
If you drive an electric car regularly, it's likely that you've seen a Gridserve charging station as customers ranked it only behind GeniePoint when it came to the location of its chargers. Competitive prices and ease of use also scored highly, but disappointing lighting and security and a poor smartphone experience meant Gridserve just missed out on a top three overall spot.<\/p>\n
\n\n
\n
Gridserve\u00a0Electric Highway<\/td>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n
Rank<\/td>\n
Percentage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Overall<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
77.67%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Prices<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
77.19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Lighting and security<\/td>\n
7<\/td>\n
79.02%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Charging speed<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
84.65%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Ease of use<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
89.34%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Number of chargers<\/td>\n
7<\/td>\n
58.00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Reliability<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
80.95%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Location of chargers<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
80.95%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Presentation and condition<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
80.60%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Customer service<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
76.62%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Smartphone app<\/td>\n
8<\/td>\n
67.43%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Accessibility and needs catering<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
79.66%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
5. Pod Point – 77.43%<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n
Pod Point failed to blow customers away in any one area but they also didn't disappoint either, resulting in a mid-table overall ranking. The smartphone app scored highest, with lighting and security just behind, while low charging speeds and the location of its chargers were the biggest gripes.<\/p>\n
\n\n
\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n
Rank<\/td>\n
Percentage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Overall<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
77.43%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Prices<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
76.68%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Lighting and security<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
80.40%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Charging speed<\/td>\n
7<\/td>\n
75.05%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Ease of use<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
82.27%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Number of chargers<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
66.00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Reliability<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
78.44%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Location of chargers<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
77.64%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Presentation and condition<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
80.61%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Customer service<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
75.61%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Smartphone app<\/td>\n
3<\/td>\n
80.04%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Accessibility and needs catering<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
78.98%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
6. The GeniePoint Network – 75.87%<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n
Inconsistency was the GeniePoint Network's biggest downfall as it scored highly in some areas, but struggled in others. Customers loved the location of its chargers, taking top spot in our survey, and cheap prices were also appreciated. However, it was let down by its low number of chargers and its suspect reliability.<\/p>\n
\n\n
\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n
Rank<\/td>\n
Percentage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Overall<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
75.87%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Prices<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
78.86%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Lighting and security<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
79.43%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Charging speed<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
80.77%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Ease of use<\/td>\n
7<\/td>\n
76.92%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Number of chargers<\/td>\n
9<\/td>\n
52.20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Reliability<\/td>\n
7<\/td>\n
73.71%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Location of chargers<\/td>\n
1<\/td>\n
81.87%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Presentation and condition<\/td>\n
7<\/td>\n
78.57%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Customer service<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
74.73%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Smartphone app<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
73.29%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Accessibility and needs catering<\/td>\n
2<\/td>\n
84.21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
7. Ionity – 74.78%<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n
Ionity is one of the biggest charging networks in Europe, but its performance in the UK will leave some alarm bells ringing. As expected it scored well for the number of chargers and charging speeds, but high prices put a lot of users off and customer service could be better.<\/p>\n
\n\n
\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n
Rank<\/td>\n
Percentage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Overall<\/td>\n
7<\/td>\n
74.78%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Prices<\/td>\n
9<\/td>\n
55.99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Lighting and security<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
79.71%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Charging speed<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
85.78%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Ease of use<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
82.16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Number of chargers<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
69.62%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Reliability<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
78.15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Location of chargers<\/td>\n
8<\/td>\n
68.09%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Presentation and condition<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
82.08%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Customer service<\/td>\n
7<\/td>\n
73.49%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Smartphone app<\/td>\n
5<\/td>\n
72.75%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Accessibility and needs catering<\/td>\n
7<\/td>\n
74.72%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
8. ChargePlace Scotland – 68.44%<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n
Owned by the Scottish Government, ChargePlace Scotland unfortunately earns a disappointing set of scores. Its relatively low prices were the only real highlight, but – just like last year – users still feel that its locations are poorly lit and are unreliable.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\n
\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n
Rank<\/td>\n
Percentage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Overall<\/td>\n
8<\/td>\n
68.44%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Prices<\/td>\n
4<\/td>\n
77.00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Lighting and security<\/td>\n
9<\/td>\n
69.29%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Charging speed<\/td>\n
9<\/td>\n
73.87%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Ease of use<\/td>\n
8<\/td>\n
76.66%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Number of chargers<\/td>\n
6<\/td>\n
58.89%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Reliability<\/td>\n
9<\/td>\n
57.84%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Location of chargers<\/td>\n
7<\/td>\n
68.99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Presentation and condition<\/td>\n
9<\/td>\n
62.72%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Customer service<\/td>\n
8<\/td>\n
68.34%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Smartphone app<\/td>\n
7<\/td>\n
68.16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Accessibility and needs catering<\/td>\n
8<\/td>\n
71.06%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
9. BP Pulse – 67.96%<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n
EV drivers continue to be unimpressed with BP Pulse, which finished last in five of 11 categories, including location, ease of use and customer service. It wasn't much better for charging speeds and reliability, two key facts for many customers. Prices were the most positive result, but a seventh place finish suggests there is still work to do.<\/p>\n